Faith versus facts: science and religion square off in the classroom

(This is the first of a monthly column dealing with ‘hot button’ topics of the day such as politics, religion, race and gender, and the environment.)

In honor of Charles Darwin’s 205th birthday on Feb. 12, I thought I would focus my inaugural column on one of the more disturbing developments in public education: the repeated attempt by school boards and state representatives across the country to introduce the religious fundamentalist belief of creationism (formerly known as intelligent design) into school system classrooms.

Simply put, creationism is the belief that a supernatural being created the universe and all things within it as explained through a literal interpretation of the Bible. Some forms of creationism hold that natural biological processes cannot account for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on Earth, a belief that flies in the face of nearly two centuries of evidence leading to our current understanding of evolution.

While I recognize each individual’s right to believe as they choose, it’s become increasingly clear that those beliefs cannot be allowed to interfere with education or science research. There is simply too much at stake.

Proponents of creationism have argued that including it in textbooks amounts to “teaching the controversy,” as if there were still an ongoing debate among scientists as to the validity of evolutionary theory. There isn’t. While there are still questions to be answered regarding its details, no serious scientist still argues against the validity of evolution’s main assertion, namely that complex biological organisms evolved from simpler ones through changes in their inherited characteristics over successive generations.

There are currently two states that allow the teaching of creationism in public schools, while 10 other states allow private schools that accept tax-funded vouchers or scholarships to include creationism in their curriculum. Responsive Ed charter schools in two other states currently use creationist curricula as well. Luckily, North Carolina’s school textbooks are currently free of creationist concepts.

For reasons that are probably too complex to decipher, the denial of evolution seems to be unique to the United States. Currently, roughly half the U.S. population believes in some form of creationism.

Earlier this month, the yawning chasm between religion and science in the U.S. was highlighted by a debate between Bill Nye, better known as the Science Guy, and Ken Ham, CEO and president of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Ky. Nye, a longtime defender of science, has argued that teaching students creationism rather than evolutionary theory does them a great disservice. Ham, meanwhile, runs a facility that, among its other highlights, includes a dinosaur wearing a saddle and displays that argue that dependence on human reasoning leads to racism and genocide.

Nye has stated that evolution is “the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology.” Working without it, he’s commented, would be comparable to “trying to do geology without believing in tectonic plates.”

Others in the field have pointed out that those who deride evolution as merely a “theory,” fundamentally misunderstand the way in which scientists use the word. Evolution is a “theory” in the same way that the Earth revolves around the sun is a theory, which is to say it’s about as close to a fact as we’re ever likely to get. (As a side note, I should point out that there are creationists who believe in Geocentrism, the idea that the Earth is fixed in space and that the universe literally revolves around it).

To be fair, the scientific community has done a thoroughly inadequate job of explaining the importance of their methods and findings to the public at large. Their representatives are often viewed as arrogant atheists set on the destruction of all faith-based worldviews.

Regardless of who’s to blame, teaching students that the Earth is only 7,000 years old instead of five billion or that humans and dinosaurs co-existed is not simply offering them an alternative opinion or theory, it’s teaching them demonstrable nonsense that flies in the face of every scrap of evidence and research-based data known to science. More importantly, it damages their future ability to function as well-informed adults in a world that is increasingly driven by scientific innovation.

At some point a choice has to be made: Allow schools to be bullied into including non-factual, supernaturally informed material in their curriculums or embrace the 21st century and encourage students to grow and learn about the reality of the world they live in.

That’s a choice the rest of the developed world has already made.

 

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Faith versus facts: science and religion square off in the classroom

  1. Seriously??? “it damages their future ability to function as well-informed adults”?? hmmmmm….i will debate this topic with you ANY DAY!!!

    • I’m not sure what there is to debate. Anyone who honestly believes the Earth is only a few thousand years old, that humans and dinosaurs co-existed and that evolution is a lie, despite every scrap of geological, fossil and DNA evidence to the contrary…well, that’s not someone that can be reasoned with. Mind you I’m not arguing against any particular religion. There are intelligent people of all faiths who accept the truth of evolution. And yes, a child is perfectly capable of growing up to be a successful lawyer or electrician or even physician while still believing things about the history of this planet and the human race that are absolutely false. But that’s certainly no excuse for those things being taught in our public, tax funded schools.

  2. Evolution believers are not the ONLY taxpayers….or even the majority of taxpayers. CREATION is NOT “absolutely false”. What some people want to be taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.
    What many evolutionists are trying to convince you of is that there is no need for a Creator since, as they say, evolution can substitute as the mechanism for creating and transforming life.They teach that life arose from non-life and evolved from simpler creatures to more complex life forms. In other words, the tiny cell eventually became an amoeba, then a lizard, then a monkey, and finally—a human?!?!? And since YOU went there, i said DEBATE…..not “REASON WITH”.

  3. The reason macroevolution is taught is because it conforms to the facts of scientific research. It has been observed numerous times both in the laboratory and within nature. Technically speaking, macroevolution is simply a continuation of microevolution. They are the same process, the only difference being the time scale involved. This isn’t something that’s disputed within the scientific community.
    As I said before, many people of faith understand and accept evolution as a fact. They simply see it as the mechanism the creator used to populate the planet. Catholic schools, for instance, teach evolution as part of their curriculum.
    You’re absolutely right, there are taxpayers of all faiths. Luckily, that has no bearing on what is taught in our schools, a point the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed time and time again.
    Finally, if you can point out to me scientific, peer reviewed studies that show evidence that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, human beings lived at the same time as dinosaurs, the sun revolves around the earth, or any other creationist claim then we will have something to discuss.
    In closing, I wholeheartedly agree with you: CREATION is NOT “absolutely false.” It is a glorious, and ever changing, REALITY!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s